THE BIBLE IS IT REALLY THE WORD OF GOD?
In the sum of the most difficult one writer can afford to confront, namely, whether the Bible is or not really the word of God is more complicated. Since early childhood, we learned she was. It would be out of all the design issues differently today! That is why this issue affects a domain of consciousness that man regards as privileged should be treated with the finest delicacy as possible. This topic is a domain dearest to us all and therefore generates a lot of times when emotions discussed. He wakes up sometimes even knee-jerk reactions.
Many authors have already touched on this subject and some of them were very respectable work and remarkable. However, a positive aspect in the debate about the Bible is that the substance is not considered taboo by many followers of the Bible ie that at any time in history the authors are brave and bold to emerge from the box and discuss the dustbin. Although it bothers a lot and discourages other fanatics bible reading these types of items but the possibility is still open in this matter. In any case the subject is never stayed in peace for long!!
defenders of the Bible, often like their counterparts caught in a sort terrorism mental or spiritual. Based on a direct question, they require a yes or no but often trap and sometimes not very honest. Being here too not sure if this express can be a pedagogy they use to convince their interlocutors, get them fit and give answers or desire pure and simply an opportunity, a strategy to make more new fans! In any case in one case as in the other, the concern to present the truth has always been relegation 'in second place. But it is a struggle emotionally and ideologically rather who always takes the front foot. The proceedings from the great question before all if the speaker believes in the Bible and whether or not the approach most rigged 'for a conversation honest and sincere. Because it is the person's response that will determine if the conversation would be possible or not. If the answer is yes, then the discussion becomes trapped because it is going to turn around just because of the Bible as absolute truth and inspired word of God, a word hint out 'by God ie a word whose author is God therefore infallible and true. So-called progressive no debate can really be in this part or the polarization of a so-called truth will make the rule of this game. But if the answer is no, then simply the defender of the Bible will simply close the debate on the argument that it is no avenue for him being a believer in the Bible, he will find difficult to discuss with an interlocutor who does not believe it! So it's just a language aborted that will not happen. However
Dear readers, ask a sincere question here. How is that defenders know the bible does the bible really they are defending? Is the Bible really the inspired word of God? or words of men who speak from the experience of a people (the Jews) with its supreme being Yahweh? Is the supreme being and the bible they are two concepts related to each other and non-detachable? That both questions relevant to what we will focus in this article that has the sole purpose of creating an awakening of consciousness by presenting historical facts and logic that will help us to address this issue we recognize the great relevance. This subject is very difficult as said above, because it touches on what is for most of us considered by 'as very dear and sacred. This topic is also linked at the domain of faith and salvation, hope, happiness has a future or present but more ties into the supreme being and very dear to each ie God Himself! This is why many easily lose their sense of objectivity and critical analysis because they are afraid to offend God in any way. We will not go that route sentimental and irresponsible because we know that only truth and knowledge release and we have the absolute conviction and God is not the enemy of truth 'or knowledge. The two concept really does make a witness to the glory of God! So no truth 'can not have the capacity to disturb or offend God. Truth 'and knowledge alone can free the black man in this quagmire of ignorance in which he fell down so deeply today. That's why we raise the assertions announce it has a high test fire with honesty, the more sincere as possible. This in the only goal of bringing the truth and the light only. We will first present the vision of the defenders of the Bible and then we will present an alternative approach to weight cons and finally a conclusion will crown our debate.
1. THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD .
The Bible is the sacred book of the Christian faith or Christian religion. this book is' more than 72 pounds. It is divided into two or testimony will, the Old Testament and New Testament. This book played a role very important in the current world situation. It is largely came from the Jewish tradition ie stories, scriptures that God would have given the Jewish people through Moses and other prophets. But also, it is constituted 'testimony of the disciples and apostles of Yehoshua (Jesus), say the Christians ... is this collection of writings known as the Word of God.
Although after the Jewish cultural heritage. The latter (the Jews) will recognize that the Old Testament as the book sacred or inspired word, and totally rejects the New Testament as an aberration of the Romans.
"The Bible is the Word of God," is the most common phrase, when following a preaching or teaching of Bible readers. Those who defend this argument, start from the fact that the Bible is a book special and unique. Indeed many of the preachers was wrong or the right to 'the gospel according to John 1: 1-3 that says: "at the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God and the word was God. " to put an emphasis on this very special book very unique. The Bible is a book inspired 'by God because it says t , Itself in the second letter of Paul to Timothy Chapter 3 16: "All Scripture is inspired" of God ... " but also preachers also rely on the second book of Peter has its chapter 1: 21 " For prophecy never been made by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried by the spirit ". (New World Translation)
Sometimes, a simple matter of pedagogy are expressed, based only on the fact that, the uniqueness of the message of the Bible is that this book was written by more than 40 different authors and for more 1500 years but have not contradicted. they keep 'the same line of revelation and the mind of God. And this is proof that the Bible is from God, besides many say "The Bible does not contradict but accomplished." is why according to the different sensitivities of the currents or ideological thinking in the Bible or faith, some ask to take the Bible literally a word for word from Genesis to the Apocalypse. Others, however, ask to see it in a spiritual way in which the scope can be revealed only with the help of the Holy Spirit an impersonal force which is the third personality of God for some, the driving force of God or just a different expression of God to others. In this regard the debate between advocates of the Bible themselves has never been 'slice'. In any case, whatever the current trends or Christians all agree on one fact that is of infallibility of the Bible and its absolute veracity. It is the revealed word of God who expresses his desire for men and his plans of salvation for all humanity that had been accomplished by the death of Yehoshua (Jesus) on the cross at Golgotha. It also announces the completion of any thing by the Last Judgement and establishment of the kingdom without end for some and eternal damnation for others. More proof of his veracity, his power is manifested in its ability to profoundly transform the lives of ordinary Christians who believe in his message.
defenders of the Bible also confirm that the Bible is complete in terms of revelations and contains all possible revelations that a man needs to live a happy on this earth. That is why when confronted has new information, they are quick to ask if this information is contained in the Bible. the popular question that everybody also know very well, and can be met during a debate on the Bible being : "Es is it Biblical?" it was intended to thank all time debate that seems to bring new or different information than that possessed by the defenders of the Bible. Because the Bible is complete they say!
THE BIBLE IS NOT THE WORD OF GOD
L was close to the bible as not being the word of God is Most disturbing for the majority 'of Christians because it seems to be their world upside down from top to bottom. However
see if there is some truth 'in this approach. It assumes that if the Bible is the Word of God, it must answer these three premises.
-It must be an inspired word of God.
-It must be complete.
_Elle must be unambiguous. "
But before we can deal with these assertions, this vision emphasizes the historical reality that the history of Bible stories had been formed, ie through the ages that the Bible was not "a single written blow or fall, the sky.
Different authors wrote different books each has its time later copy and recopy, correct and recoriger repeatedly. These are copies which were kept in a barrel of the old or new will by others. These books have been reworked several times, whenever it was necessary, as the analysis we have 'minissieusement different versions of Bibles to find the contribution of the various councils of the Christian Church from Nice, in 325 AD Vaticant2 up in 1965 and the work of the Masoretic and exegetes.
recall here that the ecumenical councils represent the gathering of all bishops of the Church to the pope's initiative, the purpose of a council is generally provide an explanation of the Christian revelation and to develop a theological college of the Christian faith.
The word "ecumenical" means universal. A council met all the bishops of the world, it represents the highest authority of the Church. The Pope should convene the council, the chair itself or to preside over one of his legates. He may transfer, suspend or dissolve. must also approve its decrees. If the Pope refuses the creed, the creed, so will not be accepted by the council . The acts of the council in character of infallibility they concern the definition of a truth of faith. The pope chose the discussion topics of the council, but the bishops may propose other with approval of course.
advocates that the Bible is the Word of God also based on the etymological definition of the Bible from the Greek Byblos ie all books or library. This approach emphasizes that the Bible is not falling, the sky but it was written by men and like any human endeavor, it is not exempted from mistakes.
1. THE BIBLE IS A BOOK SHE INSPIRE?
begin by taking the first premise assessments of the three characters that the Bible is not the word of God. The Bible is often known as infallible as it is considered the inspired word, souflée 'of God. This means that the authors of the Bible have never been 'responsibility for the contents and relevance of their writing but they were driven or driven in their drafting of the Holy Spirit or the third person of God. Come here, however, if all authors of the biblical books themselves they confirm this assertion?
SAINT LUKE
We're going from the writings of the New Testament to verify this assertion. We will take great care to remind our readers that the gospels written as the drafting of which was given 'to Luke, Matthew, Mark and John were not actually written by the hand of those authors. That is why we took great care to write gospel according Matthew According to Mark, Luke or According According to John instead of the Gospel of Matthew, Mark or Luke ... etc. 1. Luke's Gospel is thought to be actually written by the history between 80 and 85 AD by the Fathers of the Church Father Jerome and Eusebius Father. (See The Evangelist St Luke wikipedia) and whose writings were attributed to Luke was an apostle Paul and a doctor.
When we read the Gospel of Luke, the sincerity of the author's introduction is very striking! The author asserts without fear or shame that never was inspired, but of God who did that research, surveys. He was a historian, a scientist working in order to bed his narrative lens. (Luke chapter 1: 1-4). But we know very well, human labor can not be exempted from mistakes!! That is why, for example, in the family tree of Yehoshua gave by Luke; Yehoshua is the offspring of David through his son Nathan (Luke 3:31), while in Matthew the same Yehoshua is the offspring of David through his son Solomon (Matthieu1 :6-11). Solomon and Nathan were both David's son and brothers where Yehoshua could not get two brother of a man as one common ancestor at a time.
-While Matthew has given 44 ancestors from Abraham Yehoshua Luke gives 55 ancestors from Abraham? t it gives us the true genealogy?
-In Luke, the father of Joseph, foster father of Yehoshua is Heli (Luke 3:23), Matthew tells us that he is Jacob. (Matthieu1 :12-16)
When we read the letters of Paul in his Epistle to the Corinthians, to continue with our quest to see if all the authors of the Bible does claim they be inspired in all their writings? We realize that there are places where Paul explicitly states that the instructions that comes from God (1corth7: 10)
- "For the married people I give instructions, not me though, but lord. "
cad are inspired by God. But others, he is honest enough to notify that the ones he gives to these places are only his opinions entant a preacher (1 Corinthians 7:12).
- "But to others, I say, yes me, not the lord."
But dear reader be serious in what opinions are what Paul can they be the inspired word of God?
The bitter fact for some and can be happy for others to see that even from so-called authors of these texts, it is clear that they claim that all their texts are not divine inspiration. This Is not the key to understanding why it yt as inconsistencies and contradictions in many stories of new and old testament?
Why the story of Judas Iscariot's death they are contradictory in the Gospel of Matthew - (Mt 27:5-6) which says that Judas had handed officer that he had won 'the sale of Jesus in the temple and then went to hang himself and these are the priests who took this money to buy a field and the acts of the Apostle (supposedly written by Luke) who says
- Act 1-18 that Judas would have taken the money himself and buy a field, not the priests as Matthew says, and mysteriously fell into the field died and her belly open and full of blood. We will not dig all the contradictions of the New Testament but we will present this work in a few very obvious.
list here.
a) Are the that Yehoshua (Jesus) had it transports' the cross alone? Matthew 27:31 -32
not Simon siren had help '
John 7:17 p.m. yes, he even brought him up against the Suplice.
b) Are what John Baptist knew it as Yehoshua Messiah before baptism?
-Math 3:13 Yes, he knew Christ as
John 1:32 No he did acknowledged that when the Holy Spirit to descend upon him like a dove.
C) When Yehoshua (Jesu) had entered the war at Carpernaum and slave of the Roman centurion, the Roman centurion, he was coming or was it only send someone?
-He came alone Matthew 8:5
-He sent someone Luke7 :3-6
qu'esce really happened '?
D) What was the last word of Yehoshua on the cross?
John 19:30 "Everything is finished"
-Luke 23: 46 "Father, into thy hands I commend my Spirit"
Mark 15: 37 "Jesus uttered a loud cry and breathed"
E) Y Has it already is someone who rises to the sky?
-John 3:13 No "On the other hand, no man is already up at the sky, except he who descended from heaven the son of man" Yes
_2Rois 2:11 "And Elijah here ... ascended to heaven in the storm of wind ".
F) On the Cross Suplice Yehoshua was crucified, two criminals. Is that they both had insulted '?
- Matthew 27:44 and Marc15: 31 yes both reviled him.
- Luke 23:39-40 No, only a criminal injuria another had pity on him.
G) Judas sold Jesus had it with a kiss'?
- Luke 10:47 p.m. yes Judas came with a crowd and then kissed him.
- Jhon 18: 3-8 No Judas had never kissed. "
I) When Yehoshua had MEETS 'officer Jairus Jew: is what her daughter was dead? Matthew 9:18
yes, the officer came to see him and said my daughter just die.
Mark 5:23 No, the officer came to see him and said my daughter is very sick, when it is the way that someone came and told that her daughter had to die.
We showed a little list of both contraditions. you can continue the search because the list is very very long. Liser only very carefully the New Testament.
This is not only limited difficulties at New Testament but it has had even the Old Testament, we find a lot of these are some contradictions.
A) who had killed King Saul?
1Samuel-31 :4-6 he had even committed suicide.
-2 Samuel 1: 6-10 soldier Amalekite
B) Or are there that Abraham was buried, his wife Sarah?
-Act 7:16 Shechem has
-Genese 23:9 in the basement of Machapela
C) When did this Jacob had named it Bethel place of worship?
- Genesis 28:18 when his brother Esau Fuilla to mesophotamie.
-Genesis 35:14 was returning from the mesophotamie.
D) that had killed the Philistine of Gath Golithat.
-2Samuel21: 19 Elhanan Child Fair
-1 Samuel 17:23-50 David son of Jesse.
E) The famous soldier of David Basshegeth. how many he had killed one man in battle?
2samuel23-8-800
1Chronicle36: 9 300 people.
As we had made a recomendation to our readers continue trough other contraditions. We re still the same recomendation at this level. To conclude this part we ask again a question very sincere. Understand how the same Holy Spirit that would inspire, all these authors of the books of the Bible can not say the same thing on the same events by different authors tell's? what art what is happening here? ..
This will bring us to our second point is to see if the Bible is complete.
2 THE BIBLE IS IT FULL?
problemetique To better understand this, we'll do a bit of history. We know that the Bible in its present form is a work of the church universal Creaction Rome. She had seen Day with the notice the council of Nice, in 325 AD by the Roman Emperor Constantine Flabus Valerus for power created the Universal Church of Rome and other posterior councils to determine the canon of the Bible ie all retenuent books as having proof of divine inspiration for the majority of the menbres assamble 'but especially the Pope himself, while others were simply books of the Bible's REJECTED. But in its current presentation the Protestant King James Bible for example, we have thanks to the king of James Stewart who engleterre 16000 jesus after convening of the 47 most intellectual language experts under the lead of people like Shakespeare and Francis Bacon's lover a great mystical realize it. The work took 11 years to be completed in 1611 with the royal seal of APPROVAL King James.
What many of the Christian does not know is that, King Constantine was not himself a Christian king. He was named 'after his death or his deathbed. That earlier his mother who had converted to Christianity. Constantine's motivations were more political, seeking a faith that should unite and serve the Empire which was on the verge of bursting of a century of Cold War civil. So on his orders the creeds Christianity was born, and the Bible in its present form. In clear terms, we mean here that it was not by the will of God that the Bible in its present form was born, but rather by the will of the King Rome. He took great care to remove all books to reject the Apostles of Yehosuah who do not support his business. These books are in the class's largest apocryphal books.
telque: Acts of Andrew Acts of Andrew and
Matthew
Acts of Andrew and Paul
Acts of Andrew and Peter
Acts of Barnabas Acts
Jacques
Acts of John Acts of Rome
Marc
Acts of Paul Acts of Philip
Acts of Peter Acts of Peter and the Twelve Apostles Acts of Pilate
or Gospel of Nicodemus
Acts of Thaddeus
Acts of Thomas Acts
Timothy
Acts of Titus
Ezra Apocalypse Apocalypse of Stephen
1st Apocalypse of Jacques
2nd Apocalypse of Jacques
1st Apocalypse of John
2nd Apocalypse of John
third Apocalypse of John Paul
Apocalypse Apocalypse Apocalypse of Peter
Sedrach
Ascension of Isaiah
Correspondence of Paul with the Corinthians (Acts Paul X)
Correspondence of Paul and Seneca
Doctrine of Addai the Apostle
Dormition of Mary of Pseudo-John
Eulogy of Jean-Baptiste
Book of Revelation of the Apostles Epistle Elkas
Laodicean Epistle to
Letter to Lentulus
Epistle of Peter to Philip
5 Ezra 6 Ezra
Gospel Arab Jean
Armenian Gospel of the Childhood
Gospel of Barnabas
Gospel of Gamaliel
Gospel of Judas
Gospel of Mary Magdalene
Gospel of Philip Gospel of Peter
Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew Gospel
secret Marc
Gospel of Thomas Gospel Fragments
History of Childhood Jesus or Gospel according to Thomas Child
History of Joseph the carpenter
History of the Virgin
Homilies of Pseudo-Clement
Legend of Simon and Théonoé
Book of the Nativity of Mary
Book of Thomas the Athlete
Odes of Solomon
Protoevangelium of Jacques
Questions of Bartholomew
Recognition of Pseudo-Clement
Book of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ according to the apostle Bartholomew
Testament Lord's Life of Jesus in Arabic ect. .. (Reference: wikipedia) As
even refer to books that have been 'detained in the canon of the church of Roman, we realize that the Gospel of John explicitly says that such is incomplete, John 21:25. - " There, indeed, many other things which Jesus did, if ever they were written in detail, the world itself, I imagine, could not contain the writings Rollers."
So not everything is written in the New Testament about Yehoshua's life on this earth.
On the other side when we look back on the Old Testament we find the same Difficulty '. Apart from his books that had been established that canonical 2nd century after Jesus. Which reads the list of book apocryphal Old Testament: Biblical Antiquities
Apocalypse of Abraham Apocalypse of Daniel
Apocalypse of Elijah
Apocalypse of Moses, Apocalypse of Zephaniah
Apocalypse of Ezekiel
Greek Apocalypse of Baruch Syriac Apocalypse of Baruch
Apocryphon Genesis
Ascension of Moses
2 3 Baruch Baruch
Blessings
Reviewed
Habakkuk Commentary Psalms
Damascus
4 Ezra
Anthology
2 1 Enoch Enoch Enoch
3
Hymns
Joseph and Aséneth
Jubilees
3 Maccabees Legend
Hebrew Liturgy angelic Melchizedek
Book of Mysteries
Martyrdom of Isaiah
Sibylline Oracles
Chronicles of Jeremiah
Traps Women
Psalms of Solomon
Questions of Ezra
Rule of the Community Rule
Annex to Community Rules
war
Temple Scroll
Testament of Abraham Testament of Asher Benjamin
Testament of Dan Testament
Testament of Gad Testament of Isaac
Testament of Issachar Testament of Jacob
Testament of Jeremiah
Testament of Job Testament of Joseph
Testament of Judah Testament of Levi
Testament of Moses Testament of Naphtali
Testament of Reuben Testament of Solomon
Testament of Simeon Testament of Zebulun
Testimonia
Greek Life of Adam and Eve.
The difficulty of proving whether the authors of these books are actually the names appends's books is a hub of discussion among experts in this matter. Some books of the Old Testament sometimes refer to books of the prophets who are not found in the canonical books of the Old Testament. This does not make life easy for this investigation. We will quote here:
-The Book of Yashar quoted in 1 Samuel 1:18 ET Joshua 10:13
-The book of Samuel the seer cited in 1Chronicles 29:29
-The book of Nathan the prophet quoted in 1Chronicles 29:29
-Book of Gad the seer cited in 1Chronicles 29:29
-The Vision of Iddo the visionary on Jeroboam's son Nebat 2chronicle9: 29-
The book of the prophecies of "the Ahiya Shilonite 2 Chronicles 9:29.
This list is not exaustive. However, this show us that the Bible in its present form is not complete. Because that is the case in the New Testament as the Old Testament books were much 'DIFFERS's. Only people who constitute 'the guns have an answer namely when exactly why.
THE BIBLE IS IT WITHOUT AMBIGUITY?
This is the hardest question of all questions raised in this tavail. This question will require a detailed analysis of the facts to see if it can objectively answer ARISE. We will analyze certainnes assertions of the Bible to see if it can meet the scientific claims universally accepted today. This will be our starting point and then we'll see if certainnes statements bear witness to the other assertions in the same Bible.
A) ambiguity in relation to scientific claims
In this section, we first define a scientific assertion as being a statement that responds to the logic of Science experiementale ie what may have observed. Since Galileo was formalized on the experimental method. The vast majority of scientists share the views expressed, as always in a clear and strong, by Richard Feynman in his famous Feynman's lectures: "The principle of science, its definition almost, are the following: the test of all knowledge is experience. Experience is the sole judge of scientific truth. . According to Professor Kalele Kabila in Lubumbashi from universities: 'truth' scientific truth 'to reality'. " The world of nature that scientists observe is not a figment of their imagination, but simply all the creation that God himself has given life to reality '. Scientists do not make that testimony of God's creation, they are only good witnesses. The church has always sought 'to insulate science, maybe for fear that it will reveal its inconsistencies. This Vincenzo Bonaiuti was the case of Galileo (Galileo) he observes, that it was the earth revolved around the sun and not vice versa and it cost him his career, although this way of consevoir was known long time in other cultures such as Vedic culture, Kemit (Egyptian) etc ... The church would simply rocking in his comfort zone but this time it was a lie.
The Bible in its story of creation says that God, after creating the earth, every 4 th day of creation, he created the sun, moon and stars each to control a part of the day and night (Genese1: 16). This is scientifically false and very inconsevable planets are born because of the existence luminaries or stars primaries. It is the sun which is the primary star and the King of his control system that gives life and because of its Chauleur and light it emits, it also represents 99% of the masses in his system. From a logical manner the sun could not be born after the earth. In general, our galaxy is part of the logic of the history of the Universe. It appears, however, soon there are 10 billion years tells us the scientific observation, while the galaxies that exist primitive. We have to wait another 5 billion and a half years before the Sun and solar system appear. The Sun and its retinue of planets are born there are 4.6 billion years. The mechanisms of this creation are common-although with nuances. A star is formed by hundreds of thousands of years, a cloud of dust and gas. The rest of the cloud collapses in the equatorial plane, giving rise to what is called a "protoplanetary disk". It is from this disc, by accretion mechanisms, planets form: dust particles agglomerate into aggregates and these aggregates continue to agglomerate in turn. When they reach sufficient size, severity continues to attract matter. The radiation from the star, then pushes off the system gases and steam, leave the center as rocks and water. This is what gives rise to the difference between the "terrestrial planets" Mercury, the Earth or, for example, and the gas giants like Jupiter-and Saturn. The planets, as well, born in 20 million years
terrestrial planets
Once the first stage of planet formation is complete, rocky planets continue to transform itself: gravity and density mean that melts and their interior laminates . The lightest materials eventually cool and form a crust. The heat is removed to form an atmosphere. Most planets terrestrial solar system, moreover, have undergone intense bombarbement by the remnants of the training system: comets and astéroï: to descend in great numbers came to the surface. Finally, each planet followed then own evolution: Mars, for example, lost its atmosphere and its climate Venus saw thrashing and bury the world under a thick veil of clouds. The earth rotates around the sun is a truth, nobody can deny today. It is because of his translation around the sun as the seasons are available on the ground but the Bible seems to say otherwise because Josue 'had asked the sun to stop (Josue' 10:12-14). He also asked for the moon to do the same. This aberration has demonstrated very well the time of writing this book the authors do not know otherwise.
B) SOMEWHERE OVER IT EVEN.
We will continue in this difficult task in this subchapter, seek to show coment the Bible is ambiguous between these texts themselves, in a very considerable. When we read the book of Genesis in its first and second chapter we find some inconsistencies and ambiguity that's the question we pose to think whether what they were text written by the same author. Tener in the book Genese1: 20 the author tells us that 5th day of creation God crea birds and all kinds of marine animals. And 6th day of creation, he said: "Let us make man in our image ...." cad he created man the 6th day after creating 'animals and birds. Gense But when we read 2:18, the author says that after creating the 'rights and place in the garden of Eden, God saw that it was not good that man should be alone when It took the earth and formed the animals and birds he had brought the man for him to appoint's. Here man is created, before the animals and birds! The same question sincere, which of these two texts tells us these they really happened '? A series of other 
ambiguities that most of us have always accepted without thinking. When Yehoshua had market on earth. The only writings of the Jews agree that the Bible is the Old Testament ie the books of the law and those of the Prophets. The hen Yehoshua spoke in his narratives of the Scriptures, he was referring to the Old Testament and other ancient texts can be. When the disciples of Yehoshua in their sermons or text spoke of the Scriptures, they refer also to the Old Testament. For indeed, logically speaking the New Testament does not exist yet. As said above the first gospel written in the form being that of Mark, which was written around the 41 -45 years after Yehoshua. Then all the referances the writings allude to the Old Testament. When Paul in his letter Timothe '3: 18 speaks of "all Scripture is inspired by' God ', he was not referring biensure the letter he wrote that would be very illogical. He did not refer to other letters he wrote to the Romans, Titus, Corinthians or less. No more referring to the thousands of texts that circulated in his time and spoke to Yehoshua as the case of other gospels! But it was ALLUSION to texts read in synagogues has a cad Christians believe the Old Testament. It would be an intellectual malhonetete lend him a clear overall intension WAS his. It is the same pay of 'the book of revelation of John 22: 18 "I declare to every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this roll, and if someone removed something in the words of this scroll of this prophecy, God will remove his hand from the tree of life ... " This concerned only the book of Revelation of John, not the entire Bible. use this and append to pay all the writings of the Bible are as pastors and preachers is a serious intellectual malhonetete!!
Another ambiguous history is the deluge in the book Genese7 :1-24. The story that God has for evil that the man had COMIS on earth, regretted having created, and decided with the destruction of all life on earth by a great flood. Ingoré that animals such as crocodiles, sharks, whales, penguins, the hippopothames, fish, turtles, snakes, etc. ... live in water and that could not delugue destruirent even birds such as ducks live on land and water. But according to history, he was building a Noe ', the man he had decided' to save a large boat and asked him to enter the ark all the animals in pairs so they do not all perish but only after the delugue that they repopulate the earth. Ambiguities that may have enormous only be a doctoral thesis of several thousands of pages, will be enough to go in detail into each one. But here we will enumerate them quickly because the item is already very long.
1.Es what he already has anyone seen God?
1Timothe 6:16 No-one has ever seen or can see.
-Gense 32:3 o Yes Jacob had seen and had even admistrative 'of hijinks. And he was surprised and said I saw God face to face and I'm alive! Genesis 18:1-14
Yes Abraham had seen and had even dined 'with him.
NB: some swindler evokes the theory of Theophany, which in reality is meaningless. Because it can not justify why Paul person said that has never seen God?
2.Qui had encouraged 'David to count the soldiers of Israel? 2 Samuel 24:1-
God-Satan 1chronicle21 :1-5.
CONCLUSION.
We quickly traveled this difficult subject and we're pretty Honet to say that only a very little was actually said on this subject. In fact, maybe a doctoral thesis of thousands of pages can enter details of each point raised here. Although this work is not a presentation detailed 'of this issue, we believe it is an important avenue. A new runway that pastors and preachers of good faith can not help but of scrutiniser. We are very open to any kind of criticism that can help us murri the presentation and understanding of this subject. We refuse to submit work to be considered 'as a weapon for battles "Quarrels of religions and vainent sterilles. The humanity of spirit is dying and the black man is paying the price the harder and heavier because he no longer found and his disappearance be next on the horizon if it does not change Referral and really decided to live as a thinking being, a Muntu. This God-consciousness that is articulated in his body, our ancestors have called Muntu cad in the head or consciousness in Being. The ability to seek to understand the essence of life on earth as a whole.
This subject which starts in one area or the Program and the alienation of the black man is the root of 'ie the Bible is an attempt Remenda or solutions to this scourge. Since early childhood man was black program 'to believe that the Bible was the inspired Word' of God. This speech came with colonization in 1482. This word was he was forced down his throat and his conscience at the cost of whips and torture and war, as being the most special book that has never existed. Not having any of the check, the black man was the constraints of venerate without having to look if there was no truth 'in all the slogans that accompanied' the Bible. This work is very open to criticisms and contributions of every black male is neccessaire. The Bible is a book written by men (Jewish people) who experimented with a relationship with what they saw as more sacred and has conformenent culture. This may be the first understanding of these texts but they are now with the Emperor FLABUS VALERUS CONSTANTIN until today is a very powerful weapon asservisement mental. In terms of conclusion, we can say with all sincerity, that the Bible is not and will never be the word of God. Car has all the premises laid down may be to prove the contrary we have that gave reason. They have overcharged proven that the vision that think the bible is not the word of God is founded '. The Bible is a book of wisdom form, with the aim of serving the people by the power of Rome in his world conquest; stain is noted in passing that she has met. The fairy tales of combinaissons's wisdom and sometimes poorly made copy's of the book most contradictory when taken in its literal sense. The black man seriously, must reacted by seeking the truth because otherwise it is not in the book. In this period of cosmic important turning point, black people must relearn how to resoursser in culture ie wisdom EXPERIENCED 'by his ancestors before 1482. It would be very unfortunate if the black man does not wake up for as give contribution, gave the treasure that God has placed 'in it for the happiness of the whole human race.
PASTOR RAY Hagin (MWANA YA Bilak)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q29Tg-QmKbc&feature=related
0 comments:
Post a Comment